NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO
NVDA.TO (Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)) is a stock, while CIF.TO (iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. Over the past 3 years, NVDA.TO returned 73.55%/yr vs 25.67%/yr for CIF.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA.TO achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than CIF.TO's 26.30% return.
NVDA.TO
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 50.27%
- 3Y*
- 73.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 26.30%
- 6M
- 16.95%
- 1Y
- 37.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) | 15.98% | 34.82% | 167.13% | 233.70% | -37.69% |
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 26.30% | 14.45% | 25.40% | 14.65% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA.TO and CIF.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA.TO
CIF.TO
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDA.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 4.01 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 14.50 | -8.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDA.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.51 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.54 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than CIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA.TO and CIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -42.37% | -18.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.05% | -9.50% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | -20.40% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.45% | 0.00% | -7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -5.66% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 2.62% | +6.08% |
Volatility
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) at 4.34%. This indicates that NVDA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 4.34% | +8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.92% | 12.46% | +12.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.79% | 15.21% | +17.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.65% | 14.56% | +37.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.65% | 16.69% | +34.96% |
Dividends
NVDA.TO vs. CIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
NVDA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CIF.TO's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 1.75% | 2.05% | 2.84% | 2.36% | 2.53% | 2.24% | 2.06% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 2.27% | 1.81% | 2.41% |
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA.TO and CIF.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NVDA.TO and CIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer