PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA.TO is traded in CAD, while BRK-A is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-A values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA.TO achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-A's -4.24% return.


NVDA.TO

1D
-3.51%
1M
8.02%
YTD
14.32%
6M
18.33%
1Y
48.72%
3Y*
72.52%
5Y*
10Y*

BRK-A

1D
1.33%
1M
3.58%
YTD
-4.24%
6M
-6.21%
1Y
-3.12%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
13.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVDA.TO
Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)
14.32%34.82%167.13%233.70%-37.69%
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.24%5.77%36.27%13.22%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA.TO and BRK-A is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.10

The correlation between NVDA.TO and BRK-A shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA.TO
NVDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-A
BRK-A Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BRK-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-A Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-A Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDA.TOBRK-ADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.98

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

-0.27

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

-0.56

+6.19

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the BRK-A Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA.TO and BRK-A, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDA.TOBRK-ADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

-0.21

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.84

+0.40

Drawdowns

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than BRK-A's maximum drawdown of -23.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA.TO and BRK-A.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDA.TOBRK-ADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-23.90%

-37.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.05%

-11.81%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.49%

-17.01%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-13.66%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-5.22%

-10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

5.65%

+3.04%

Volatility

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison

Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.46% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) at 3.98%. This indicates that NVDA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDA.TOBRK-ADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.46%

3.98%

+8.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.90%

11.33%

+13.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.87%

14.85%

+18.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.67%

16.24%

+35.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.67%

17.97%

+33.70%

Dividends

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Dividend Comparison

NVDA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while BRK-A has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA.TO
Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%

Financials

NVDA.TO vs. BRK-A - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


70.00B75.00B80.00B85.00B90.00B95.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
93.68B
(NVDA.TO) Total Revenue
(BRK-A) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NVDA.TO values in CAD, BRK-A values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA.TO and BRK-A have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA.TO and BRK-A

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer