NVD vs. SPDN
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. NVD is actively managed, while SPDN is passively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -68.07% vs -17.23% for SPDN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
NVD vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -37.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -8.13% return.
NVD
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -22.72%
- YTD
- -37.20%
- 6M
- -40.09%
- 1Y
- -68.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -7.68%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -12.98%
- 5Y*
- -8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
NVD vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -37.20% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -8.13% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -6.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and SPDN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between NVD and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
SPDN
NVD vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.78 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.96 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.75 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | -1.43 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | -0.70 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
NVD vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -75.31% | -23.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.64% | -17.95% | -54.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.15% | -75.26% | -23.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -48.55% | -33.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.83% | 9.84% | +37.99% |
Volatility
NVD vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 25.96% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 2.72%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.96% | 2.72% | +23.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.11% | 9.09% | +43.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.48% | 12.09% | +56.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 16.86% | +75.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 18.03% | +74.52% |
NVD vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVD vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than SPDN's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 18.83% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 4.11% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and SPDN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (25.96%) compared to SPDN (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 1-year performance, SPDN leads with -17.23% vs -68.07% for NVD. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -17.23% return vs -68.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.83%, compared with 4.11% for SPDN.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 0.50% for SPDN.
NVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.00 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer