NVD vs. SFY
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index. NVD is actively managed, while SFY is passively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -49.89% vs 23.88% for SFY. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFY.
Performance
NVD vs. SFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -33.57% return, which is significantly lower than SFY's 11.93% return.
NVD
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -33.00%
- YTD
- -33.57%
- 1Y
- -49.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFY
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- —
NVD vs. SFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -33.57% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 11.93% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and SFY is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.74 |
The correlation between NVD and SFY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
NVD vs. SFY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVD
SFY
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
NVD
SFY
Basic Materials
NVD
-
SFY
Communication Services
NVD
-
SFY
Consumer Cyclical
NVD
-
SFY
Consumer Defensive
NVD
-
SFY
Energy
NVD
-
SFY
Financial Services
NVD
-
SFY
Healthcare
NVD
-
SFY
Industrials
NVD
-
SFY
Real Estate
NVD
-
SFY
Utilities
NVD
-
SFY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. SFY — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
SFY
NVD vs. SFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVD | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.22 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 8.81 | -10.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVD vs. SFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than SFY's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and SFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -33.25% | -66.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.41% | -10.79% | -49.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.11% | -3.26% | -95.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.23% | -6.14% | -76.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.69% | 2.72% | +29.97% |
Volatility
NVD vs. SFY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 22.59% compared to SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) at 4.80%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.59% | 4.80% | +17.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.39% | 12.76% | +43.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.85% | 15.80% | +56.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.20% | 19.25% | +72.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.20% | 20.21% | +71.99% |
NVD vs. SFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SFY's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVD vs. SFY - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, more than SFY's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 17.80% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and SFY have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (22.59%) compared to SFY (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs SFY's -33.25%.
On 1-year performance, SFY leads with 23.88% vs -49.89% for NVD. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SFY has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFY has performed better with a 23.88% return vs -49.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.80%, compared with 0.85% for SFY.
NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SFY is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 0.00% for SFY.
SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and SFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer