NVD vs. PTIR
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -68.07% vs -18.36% for PTIR. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
NVD vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -37.20% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -46.69% return.
NVD
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -22.72%
- YTD
- -37.20%
- 6M
- -40.09%
- 1Y
- -68.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- -46.69%
- 6M
- -47.81%
- 1Y
- -18.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -37.20% | -73.27% | -43.79% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -46.69% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and PTIR is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | -0.43 |
NVD vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVD
PTIR
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVD
PTIR
Basic Materials
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Communication Services
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Cyclical
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Energy
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Financial Services
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Healthcare
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Industrials
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Real Estate
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Utilities
NVD
-
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
PTIR
NVD vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVD | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.27 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -0.46 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVD | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | -0.18 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | 1.96 | -2.84 |
Drawdowns
NVD vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -69.10% | -30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.64% | -68.11% | -4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.15% | -63.26% | -35.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -27.55% | -54.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.83% | 39.74% | +8.09% |
Volatility
NVD vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is 25.96%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 33.41%. This indicates that NVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.96% | 33.41% | -7.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.11% | 77.09% | -24.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.48% | 103.09% | -34.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 129.44% | -36.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 129.44% | -36.89% |
NVD vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVD vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than PTIR's 10.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 18.83% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 10.90% | 5.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and PTIR have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (33.41%) compared to NVD (25.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs PTIR's -69.10%.
On 1-year performance, PTIR leads with -18.36% vs -68.07% for NVD. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 25.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTIR has performed better with a -18.36% return vs -68.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.83%, compared with 10.90% for PTIR.
NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 1.15% for PTIR.
PTIR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer