NVD vs. CONL

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CONL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -52.23% vs -86.56% for CONL. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

NVD vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -41.96% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -71.60% return.

NVD

• 1D: -7.16%
• 1M: -23.71%
• 6M: -48.51%
• YTD: -41.96%
• 1Y: -52.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -79.64%

CONL

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -25.98%
• 6M: -46.60%
• YTD: -71.60%
• 1Y: -86.56%
• 3Y*: -32.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	$84.90M	$86.79M	$121.63M
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	$413.83M	$389.42M	$338.83M

NVD vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-41.96%	-73.27%	-93.09%	-15.28%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-71.60%	-58.49%	4.23%	222.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and CONL is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	-0.39

NVD vs. CONL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVD	CONL
Technology	200.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NVD vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVD vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVD	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	-0.65	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	-1.21	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.87	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.94	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	-1.26	-0.29

NVD vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVD vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum CONL drawdown of -95.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVD	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.26%	-95.30%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.80%	-91.79%	+31.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-95.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.22%	-95.12%	-4.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.55%	-57.58%	-24.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.74%	68.49%	-34.75%

Volatility

NVD vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is 25.77%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 39.68%. This indicates that NVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVD	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.77%	39.68%	-13.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.67%	108.50%	-50.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.33%	134.44%	-61.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.04%	149.22%	-57.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.04%	149.22%	-57.18%

NVD vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVD vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.38%, while CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%	0.00%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	20.38%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVD and CONL in my portfolio?

NVD and CONL have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVD or CONL?

CONL has higher volatility (39.68%) compared to NVD (25.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs CONL's -95.30%.

Which ETF is better, NVD or CONL?

On 1-year performance, NVD leads with -52.23% vs -86.56% for CONL. On fees, CONL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 25.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVD or CONL?

Over the 1-year period, NVD has performed better with a -52.23% return vs -86.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVD or CONL?

CONL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVD or CONL?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 20.38%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between NVD and CONL?

NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CONL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.