NVBU vs. OCTW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NVBU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Allianz. NVBU is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past year, NVBU returned 16.57% vs 11.12% for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

NVBU vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBU achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than OCTW's 6.05% return.

NVBU

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 6.18%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.71%

OCTW

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.05%
• 6M: 5.15%
• YTD: 6.05%
• 1Y: 11.12%
• 3Y*: 10.56%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVBU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF	$99.87K	$148.41K	$110.91K
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	$661.03K	$1.16M	$4.50M

NVBU vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVBU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF	7.36%	13.27%	1.42%
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	6.05%	9.68%	1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBU and OCTW is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024	0.92

The correlation between NVBU and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVBU vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVBU

NVBU Risk / Return Rank: 70
NVBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
NVBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NVBU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
NVBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVBU Martin Ratio Rank: 76

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 88
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVBU vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVBU	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.25	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.33	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.46	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.06	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.55	15.49	-4.94

NVBU vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBU Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the OCTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBU and OCTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVBU vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBU drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBU and OCTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVBU	OCTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.97%	-8.38%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-3.65%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	0.00%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-0.80%	-1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	0.72%	+0.85%

Volatility

NVBU vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 1.23%. This indicates that NVBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVBU	OCTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	1.23%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.20%	3.90%	+3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.88%	4.97%	+4.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.12%	6.33%	+4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.12%	6.10%	+5.02%

NVBU vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVBU and OCTW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

NVBU vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBU nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVBU and OCTW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, NVBU and OCTW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NVBU or OCTW?

NVBU has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to OCTW (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBU dropped -11.97% vs OCTW's -8.38%.

Which ETF is better, NVBU or OCTW?

On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 16.57% vs 11.12% for OCTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVBU or OCTW?

Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 16.57% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVBU or OCTW?

NVBU and OCTW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVBU or OCTW?

NVBU and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.