PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVAX vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVAX vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVAX achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 234.66% return.


NVAX

1D
0.52%
1M
-17.65%
6M
-6.89%
YTD
14.58%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
-1.51%
5Y*
-47.33%
10Y*
-25.83%
ALL TIME*
-7.79%

AMDL

1D
-16.90%
1M
-29.48%
6M
311.38%
YTD
234.66%
1Y
314.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$243.26M$222.94M$321.64M
$22.26M$25.69M$41.53M

NVAX vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.
14.58%-16.42%51.98%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
234.66%103.00%-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between NVAX and AMDL is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVAX vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVAX
NVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVAX vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVAXAMDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.35

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

5.65

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

10.58

-9.88

NVAX vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVAX and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVAX vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVAX drawdown since its inception was -98.82%, which is greater than AMDL's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVAX and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVAXAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.82%

-88.63%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-56.13%

+20.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.59%

-37.11%

-60.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.89%

-46.43%

-24.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.50%

29.94%

-9.44%

Volatility

NVAX vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) is 10.84%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 50.68%. This indicates that NVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVAXAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

50.68%

-39.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.13%

114.03%

-67.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.35%

144.28%

-75.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.24%

121.72%

-16.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.51%

121.72%

-6.21%

Dividends

NVAX vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVAX nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NVAX and AMDL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (50.68%) compared to NVAX (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVAX dropped -98.82% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVAX and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer