NUSA vs. SDSI
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI).
NUSA and SDSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUSA is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond (1-5 Y). It was launched on Mar 31, 2017. SDSI is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022. Both NUSA and SDSI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NUSA vs. SDSI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUSA vs. SDSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSA Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.26% | 5.89% | 3.52% | 5.19% | 1.88% |
SDSI American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF | 0.32% | 6.54% | 5.63% | 5.88% | 2.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSA achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than SDSI's 0.32% return.
NUSA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.60%
- 10Y*
- —
SDSI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 5.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUSA vs. SDSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SDSI's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUSA vs. SDSI — Risk / Return Rank
NUSA
SDSI
NUSA vs. SDSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSA | SDSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.05 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 2.83 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.49 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.89 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 16.09 | -4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSA | SDSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.05 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 2.57 | -1.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSA and SDSI is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NUSA vs. SDSI - Dividend Comparison
NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than SDSI's 4.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSA Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.82% | 3.83% | 3.93% | 3.54% | 2.44% | 2.16% | 2.51% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 2.20% |
SDSI American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF | 4.53% | 4.91% | 5.49% | 5.37% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NUSA vs. SDSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, which is greater than SDSI's maximum drawdown of -1.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and SDSI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSA | SDSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -1.29% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -1.29% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.61% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -0.25% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.31% | +0.03% |
Volatility
NUSA vs. SDSI - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) have volatilities of 0.81% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUSA | SDSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 0.79% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 2.46% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 2.31% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 2.31% | +0.43% |