NUSA vs. LQDI
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI).
NUSA and LQDI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUSA is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond (1-5 Y). It was launched on Mar 31, 2017. LQDI is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 8, 2018.
Performance
NUSA vs. LQDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUSA vs. LQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSA Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.89% | 3.52% | 5.19% | -5.91% | -1.04% | 4.85% | 5.62% | 2.21% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | -0.18% | 8.84% | 1.48% | 8.85% | -15.33% | 7.53% | 11.82% | 15.83% | -2.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSA achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than LQDI's -0.18% return.
NUSA
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUSA vs. LQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDI's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NUSA vs. LQDI — Risk / Return Rank
NUSA
LQDI
NUSA vs. LQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSA | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 0.80 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 1.11 | +1.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.19 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 3.97 | +7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSA | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.80 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.27 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.39 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSA and LQDI is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NUSA vs. LQDI - Dividend Comparison
NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than LQDI's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSA Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.82% | 3.83% | 3.93% | 3.54% | 2.44% | 2.16% | 2.51% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 2.20% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NUSA vs. LQDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, smaller than the maximum LQDI drawdown of -28.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and LQDI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSA | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -28.99% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -4.01% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.44% | -20.67% | +11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.52% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -5.36% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 1.21% | -0.88% |
Volatility
NUSA vs. LQDI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) is 0.80%, while iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that NUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUSA | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 2.20% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | 3.81% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 6.01% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 8.21% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 10.94% | -8.20% |