NUSA vs. VGIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT).
NUSA and VGIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUSA is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond (1-5 Y). It was launched on Mar 31, 2017. VGIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 3-10 Year Government Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. Both NUSA and VGIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUSA or VGIT.
Correlation
The correlation between NUSA and VGIT is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
NUSA vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NUSA:
2.30
VGIT:
1.35
NUSA:
3.69
VGIT:
2.06
NUSA:
1.47
VGIT:
1.24
NUSA:
2.39
VGIT:
0.53
NUSA:
9.23
VGIT:
3.24
NUSA:
0.65%
VGIT:
1.93%
NUSA:
2.50%
VGIT:
4.60%
NUSA:
-9.44%
VGIT:
-16.05%
NUSA:
-0.49%
VGIT:
-5.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSA achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than VGIT's 3.17% return.
NUSA
2.41%
0.45%
2.76%
6.07%
1.32%
N/A
VGIT
3.17%
0.55%
2.79%
6.40%
-0.96%
1.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUSA vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUSA vs. VGIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NUSA
VGIT
NUSA vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NUSA vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
NUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than VGIT's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSA Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.95% | 3.93% | 3.54% | 2.44% | 2.16% | 2.51% | 2.84% | 3.22% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.74% | 3.67% | 2.72% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
NUSA vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSA drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSA and VGIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUSA vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUSA) is 0.84%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that NUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with NUSA or VGIT
Recent discussions
Bonds (BND and/or BNDX) are greatly favored over stocks by the optimizer
I have not seem many orange lines winning against original or benchmark no matter what I do. But the software seems to be doing something when all is stock or stock ETFs. However, Bonds and Stocks don't work well together. The moment I add BND or BNDX, the optimizer puts almost all of the weight in the bonds. I ran out of the free limit of calculations.
Maybe it's a message we all need to hear: invest in bond ETFs. Maybe I'm not using the tool correctly. Maybe there is something wrong with the tool.
I don't know.
-- Fred
Fred
Additions to Wishlist: Monte-Carlo Simulations
Hello Dmitry,
Is it possible to add Monte-Carlo simulations to the list of available tools? Since Portfolioslab doesn't have it, I need to use some other Websites just to run Monte-Carlos of my portfolios. Thank you!
Investing_4Fun
Portfolio by date created
Ryan M Dorsey