NUMV vs. NUAG
NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) and NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NUAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUMV returned 6.55%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for NUAG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUMV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for NUAG.
Performance
NUMV vs. NUAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUMV achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly higher than NUAG's 0.50% return.
NUMV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
NUAG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV vs. NUAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 9.74% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 0.91% | 29.81% | -11.91% | 14.70% |
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.37% | 2.02% | 7.52% | -13.97% | -2.03% | 7.48% | 10.13% | -1.45% | 3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUMV and NUAG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, NUMV and NUAG have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUMV vs. NUAG — Risk / Return Rank
NUMV
NUAG
NUMV vs. NUAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUMV | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.33 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 7.06 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUMV | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.65 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.08 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.31 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
NUMV vs. NUAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than NUAG's maximum drawdown of -19.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and NUAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUMV | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -19.79% | -23.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -2.54% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -5.61% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.71% | -19.19% | -6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -1.23% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -4.95% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 0.84% | +1.45% |
Volatility
NUMV vs. NUAG - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) at 1.15%. This indicates that NUMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUMV | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 1.15% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 2.59% | +6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 3.58% | +8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 6.01% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 5.49% | +14.28% |
NUMV vs. NUAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NUAG's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUMV vs. NUAG - Dividend Comparison
NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than NUAG's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.43% | 4.44% | 3.95% | 3.60% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.54% | 3.79% | 3.38% | 0.48% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUMV and NUAG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUMV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to NUAG (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs NUAG's -19.79%.
On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 6.55% vs 0.47% for NUAG. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NUAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 0.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.
NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.
NUMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while NUAG is Intermediate Core Bond. NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NUAG tracks ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.19% for NUAG.
NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUMV and NUAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer