NUMG vs. NUDM
NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and NUDM (Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while NUDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG International DM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUMG returned 0.99%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for NUDM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
NUMG vs. NUDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than NUDM's 7.90% return.
NUMG
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NUMG vs. NUDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -0.40% | 0.78% | 11.99% | 20.47% | -28.31% | 12.27% | 45.73% | 34.87% | -5.79% | 9.15% |
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 7.90% | 29.60% | 5.47% | 17.70% | -15.16% | 10.62% | 10.06% | 24.58% | -14.82% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUMG and NUDM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.65 |
The correlation between NUMG and NUDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NUMG vs. NUDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUMG
NUDM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
NUMG
NUDM
Industrials
NUMG
NUDM
Healthcare
NUMG
NUDM
Consumer Cyclical
NUMG
NUDM
Financial Services
NUMG
NUDM
Communication Services
NUMG
NUDM
Real Estate
NUMG
NUDM
Basic Materials
NUMG
NUDM
Utilities
NUMG
NUDM
Consumer Defensive
NUMG
-
NUDM
Energy
NUMG
-
NUDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUMG vs. NUDM — Risk / Return Rank
NUMG
NUDM
NUMG vs. NUDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUMG | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.25 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 1.73 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 6.46 | -6.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUMG | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.37 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.48 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
NUMG vs. NUDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NUDM's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NUDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUMG | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.85% | -32.01% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.71% | -12.50% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.58% | -13.47% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.85% | -30.09% | -8.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.34% | -1.71% | -7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -6.86% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 3.34% | +4.25% |
Volatility
NUMG vs. NUDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) is 4.75%, while Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that NUMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUMG | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 5.22% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 13.03% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 15.74% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 16.64% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 17.59% | +4.28% |
NUMG vs. NUDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NUMG and NUDM have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
NUMG vs. NUDM - Dividend Comparison
NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NUDM's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 6.92% | 7.46% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 4.31% | 1.47% | 3.42% | 2.45% | 0.47% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 12.76% | 3.82% | 0.27% | 5.14% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUMG and NUDM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NUMG (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs NUDM's -32.01%.
On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs 0.99% for NUMG. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, NUMG has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUMG and NUDM have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.
NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while NUDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM.
NUDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUMG and NUDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer