PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMG vs. NUDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUMG vs. NUDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUMG vs. NUDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-13.96%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%12.27%45.73%34.87%-5.79%9.15%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
-0.28%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%8.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than NUDM's -0.28% return.


NUMG

1D
3.29%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-4.28%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*

NUDM

1D
3.56%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
3.27%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUMG vs. NUDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NUMG and NUDM have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Return for Risk

NUMG vs. NUDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. NUDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMGNUDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.18

1.24

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

1.74

-1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.24

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.66

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.65

6.66

-7.31

NUMG vs. NUDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the NUDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and NUDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMGNUDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

1.24

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.46

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.43

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and NUDM is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NUMG vs. NUDM - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NUDM's 7.48% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
7.48%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. NUDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NUDM's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NUDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMGNUDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-32.01%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

-12.50%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

-30.09%

-8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.68%

-9.16%

-12.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-6.92%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

3.12%

+3.35%

Volatility

NUMG vs. NUDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) is 6.83%, while Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that NUMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUMGNUDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

8.28%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

11.67%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

17.77%

+5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

16.47%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

17.56%

+4.36%