PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. ESGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDM vs. ESGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NUDM having a 10.38% return and ESGD slightly higher at 10.63%.


NUDM

1D
0.18%
1M
2.94%
YTD
10.38%
6M
10.38%
1Y
26.08%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*

ESGD

1D
0.40%
1M
2.37%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.98%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDM vs. ESGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
10.38%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%8.40%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
10.63%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%8.20%23.12%-13.33%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and ESGD is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.93

The correlation between NUDM and ESGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUDM vs. ESGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDM
ESGD

Financial Services

25.6%
26.6%

Industrials

20.8%
18.4%

Technology

13.1%
13.2%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
6.6%

Basic Materials

5.7%
5.6%

Communication Services

5.3%
4.2%

Utilities

3.5%
3.6%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.6%

Energy

0.6%
3.4%

Financial Services

NUDM
25.6%
ESGD
26.6%

Industrials

NUDM
20.8%
ESGD
18.4%

Technology

NUDM
13.1%
ESGD
13.2%

Healthcare

NUDM
10.2%
ESGD
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

NUDM
6.9%
ESGD
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NUDM
6.1%
ESGD
6.6%

Basic Materials

NUDM
5.7%
ESGD
5.6%

Communication Services

NUDM
5.3%
ESGD
4.2%

Utilities

NUDM
3.5%
ESGD
3.6%

Real Estate

NUDM
2.2%
ESGD
1.6%

Energy

NUDM
0.6%
ESGD
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. ESGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDM vs. ESGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUDMESGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.11

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

7.87

-0.07

NUDM vs. ESGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the ESGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and ESGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. ESGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum ESGD drawdown of -33.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and ESGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMESGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-33.70%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-11.68%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-13.86%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-30.03%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-6.16%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.12%

+0.23%

Volatility

NUDM vs. ESGD - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) have volatilities of 4.95% and 4.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDMESGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

4.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

13.27%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

15.73%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

16.69%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

16.99%

+0.61%

NUDM vs. ESGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGD's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDM vs. ESGD - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than ESGD's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.31%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.76%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NUDM and ESGD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGD has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to NUDM (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs ESGD's -33.70%.

On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 8.97% vs 8.77% for ESGD. On fees, ESGD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 3.31% for ESGD.

NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.20% for ESGD.

NUDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDM and ESGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer