PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. NULC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NULG vs. NULC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NULG vs. NULC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
-6.02%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%19.03%
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
-2.29%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%25.69%22.51%16.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than NULC's -2.29% return.


NULG

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
-6.02%
6M
-7.41%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*

NULC

1D
1.02%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULG vs. NULC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NULC's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. NULC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. NULC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGNULCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

0.97

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.47

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.57

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.06

6.94

-2.89

NULG vs. NULC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the NULC Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and NULC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGNULCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.97

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.68

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between NULG and NULC is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NULG vs. NULC - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than NULC's 10.41% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.12%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
10.41%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NULG vs. NULC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, roughly equal to the maximum NULC drawdown of -34.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and NULC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGNULCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-34.86%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-11.34%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-27.90%

-8.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.24%

-5.49%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-6.43%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.56%

+1.77%

Volatility

NULG vs. NULC - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) at 5.48%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NULGNULCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

5.48%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

10.17%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

18.07%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

16.83%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

19.82%

+1.64%