PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. NUDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULG vs. NUDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than NUDM's 8.73% return.


NULG

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.41%
YTD
16.76%
6M
15.85%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*

NUDM

1D
0.77%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.73%
6M
10.27%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULG vs. NUDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
16.76%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%39.23%0.31%10.08%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
8.73%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NULG and NUDM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.67

The correlation between NULG and NUDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULG vs. NUDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULG
NUDM

Technology

56.5%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
6.0%

Industrials

9.4%
21.2%

Financial Services

7.1%
25.9%

Communication Services

6.5%
4.5%

Healthcare

5.5%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
7.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.3%

Energy

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Technology

NULG
56.5%
NUDM
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NULG
9.8%
NUDM
6.0%

Industrials

NULG
9.4%
NUDM
21.2%

Financial Services

NULG
7.1%
NUDM
25.9%

Communication Services

NULG
6.5%
NUDM
4.5%

Healthcare

NULG
5.5%
NUDM
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

NULG
2.1%
NUDM
7.4%

Basic Materials

NULG
1.9%
NUDM
5.4%

Real Estate

NULG
1.2%
NUDM
2.3%

Energy

NULG

-

NUDM
0.7%

Utilities

NULG

-

NUDM
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. NUDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. NUDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGNUDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.76

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

6.59

-0.37

NULG vs. NUDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NUDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and NUDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGNUDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.40

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.48

+0.41

Drawdowns

NULG vs. NUDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than NUDM's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and NUDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGNUDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-32.01%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-12.50%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-13.47%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-30.09%

-6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.96%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-6.86%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

3.34%

+0.92%

Volatility

NULG vs. NUDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) is 4.80%, while Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that NULG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULGNUDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.09%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

13.04%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

15.73%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

16.64%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

17.59%

+3.80%

NULG vs. NUDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NULG vs. NUDM - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than NUDM's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.86%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULG and NUDM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDM has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to NULG (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULG dropped -36.17% vs NUDM's -32.01%.

On 5-year performance, NULG leads with 14.66% vs 8.14% for NUDM. On fees, NULG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NULG has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULG has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.86%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NULG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NUDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth, while NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NULG and 0.30% for NUDM.

NULG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULG and NUDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer