PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULC vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NULC vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NULC vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
-3.28%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%4.40%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-6.67%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's -6.67% return.


NULC

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*

QCLR

1D
1.60%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-6.67%
6M
-5.64%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULC vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NULC vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULC vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULCQCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.91

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.35

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.06

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.75

4.33

+2.42

NULC vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and QCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULCQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.91

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.53

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and QCLR is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NULC vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, less than QCLR's 15.95% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
10.51%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.95%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NULC vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and QCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NULCQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.86%

-21.77%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-10.22%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-8.78%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-6.32%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.50%

+0.03%

Volatility

NULC vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.86%. This indicates that NULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NULCQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

3.86%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

8.53%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

12.06%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

12.61%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.83%

12.61%

+7.22%