PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULC vs. NUDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULC vs. NUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than NUDV's 15.18% return.


NULC

1D
1.94%
1M
4.01%
6M
14.56%
YTD
16.79%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.13%

NUDV

1D
1.07%
1M
2.72%
6M
9.33%
YTD
15.18%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$274.48K$231.69K$180.39K
$320.07K$400.60K$268.48K

NULC vs. NUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
16.79%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%4.97%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
15.18%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and NUDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between NULC and NUDV has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NULC vs. NUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULC
NUDV

Technology

40.7%
13.3%

Financial Services

12.4%
23.4%

Healthcare

9.9%
13.7%

Industrials

9.0%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
5.7%

Communication Services

6.7%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
10.3%

Energy

2.1%
2.6%

Utilities

2.0%
6.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.5%
4.2%

Technology

NULC
40.7%
NUDV
13.3%

Financial Services

NULC
12.4%
NUDV
23.4%

Healthcare

NULC
9.9%
NUDV
13.7%

Industrials

NULC
9.0%
NUDV
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NULC
7.5%
NUDV
5.7%

Communication Services

NULC
6.7%
NUDV
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

NULC
6.3%
NUDV
10.3%

Energy

NULC
2.1%
NUDV
2.6%

Utilities

NULC
2.0%
NUDV
6.6%

Real Estate

NULC
2.0%
NUDV
4.5%

Basic Materials

NULC
1.5%
NUDV
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULC vs. NUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NULC vs. NUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NULCNUDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.56

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

13.02

-2.75

NULC vs. NUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the NUDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and NUDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NULC vs. NUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, which is greater than NUDV's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and NUDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULCNUDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.86%

-20.10%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-6.60%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.53%

-16.48%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-4.77%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.80%

+0.43%

Volatility

NULC vs. NUDV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) at 3.27%. This indicates that NULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULCNUDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.27%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

7.71%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

10.40%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

14.84%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

14.84%

+5.05%

NULC vs. NUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NULC vs. NUDV - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than NUDV's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.23%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
8.71%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULC and NUDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULC has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to NUDV (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULC dropped -34.86% vs NUDV's -20.10%.

On 3-year performance, NULC leads with 20.15% vs 15.49% for NUDV. On fees, NULC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NULC has performed better with a 20.15% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NUDV.

NULC has the higher dividend yield at 8.71%, compared with 2.23% for NUDV.

NULC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NUDV is Large Cap Value Equities. NULC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap, while NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NULC and 0.26% for NUDV.

NUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULC and NUDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer