NUKZ vs. XLEI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - NUKZ tracks the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index while XLEI tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 9.75% vs 35.36% for XLEI. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLEI.

Performance

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 24.56% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -4.27%
• 6M: -8.28%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 1Y: 9.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 44.25%

XLEI

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 10.90%
• 6M: 15.89%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 1Y: 35.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 32.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	$6.06M	$6.01M	$8.30M
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$1.55M	$1.39M	$1.31M

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.28%	6.73%
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	24.56%	6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and XLEI is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	-0.04

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUKZ	XLEI
Industrials	47.1%	-
Utilities	35.6%	-
Energy	11.2%	100.0%
Basic Materials	4.7%	-
Technology	1.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	102.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 16

XLEI

XLEI Risk / Return Rank: 89
XLEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XLEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XLEI Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XLEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XLEI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKZ	XLEI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	2.40	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	3.00	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.41	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	4.11	-3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	12.37	-11.57

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the XLEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and XLEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than XLEI's maximum drawdown of -8.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and XLEI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	XLEI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-8.19%	-24.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.29%	-8.19%	-12.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.46%	0.00%	-16.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-1.84%	-4.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.42%	2.74%	+5.68%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) at 3.96%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	XLEI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.21%	3.96%	+5.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.79%	11.26%	+12.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.03%	14.03%	+17.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.74%	14.02%	+18.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.74%	14.02%	+18.72%

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than XLEI's 18.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.91%	0.91%	0.09%
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	18.37%	10.17%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and XLEI in my portfolio?

NUKZ and XLEI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or XLEI?

NUKZ has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to XLEI (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs XLEI's -8.19%.

Which ETF is better, NUKZ or XLEI?

On 1-year performance, XLEI leads with 35.36% vs 9.75% for NUKZ. On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLEI has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUKZ or XLEI?

Over the 1-year period, XLEI has performed better with a 35.36% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKZ or XLEI?

XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKZ or XLEI?

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 18.37%, compared with 0.91% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NUKZ and XLEI?

NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.35% for XLEI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.