PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKZ vs. TEXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TEXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than TEXU's 61.53% return.


NUKZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
-4.27%
6M
-8.28%
YTD
0.28%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
44.25%

TEXU

1D
3.70%
1M
20.93%
6M
27.67%
YTD
61.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.06M$6.01M$8.30M
$74.49K$95.78K$95.00K

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and TEXU is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. TEXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TEXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUKZTEXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, roughly equal to the maximum TEXU drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and TEXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKZTEXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-31.71%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-15.96%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-8.67%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUKZTEXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.03%

40.87%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.74%

40.87%

-8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.74%

40.87%

-8.13%

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TEXU's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUKZ vs. TEXU - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than TEXU's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.91%0.91%0.09%
TEXU
Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF
1.36%0.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUKZ and TEXU have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NUKZ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUKZ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TEXU.

TEXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.91% for NUKZ.

NUKZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while TEXU is Leveraged Equities. NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while TEXU tracks S&P 500 Energy (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.98% for TEXU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUKZ and TEXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer