NUKZ vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - NUKZ tracks the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 41.42% vs 67.58% for CRAK. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 33.23% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 41.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRAK

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: 33.23%
• 6M: 27.96%
• 1Y: 67.58%
• 3Y*: 22.78%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	13.31%	56.57%	62.98%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	33.23%	39.11%	-13.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and CRAK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.28

The correlation between NUKZ and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUKZ	CRAK
Industrials	45.9%	4.0%
Utilities	35.8%	-
Energy	12.9%	98.9%
Basic Materials	4.0%	1.1%
Technology	1.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUKZ	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	3.70	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	4.76	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.62	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	7.93	-5.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.34	22.48	-16.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUKZ	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	3.70	-2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.75	0.54	+1.21

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-58.80%	+25.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-8.57%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.61%	-3.81%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-12.50%	+6.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.55%	3.02%	+3.53%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.74%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.30%	6.74%	+3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.05%	14.27%	+7.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.74%	18.35%	+11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.70%	20.61%	+12.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.70%	22.16%	+10.54%

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than CRAK's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.51%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and CRAK in my portfolio?

NUKZ and CRAK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or CRAK?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to CRAK (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, NUKZ or CRAK?

On 1-year performance, CRAK leads with 67.58% vs 41.42% for NUKZ. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUKZ or CRAK?

Over the 1-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 67.58% return vs 41.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKZ or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKZ or CRAK?

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.80% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NUKZ and CRAK?

NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.