NUKZ vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NUKZ is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 28.33% vs 61.61% for BESF. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

NUKZ vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 16.12% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 15.17%
• 1Y: 61.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	9.01%	24.81%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	16.12%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and BESF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 29
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 84
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKZ	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.52	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	3.34	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.41	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	5.64	-3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	15.57	-11.46

NUKZ vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-10.97%	-22.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-10.97%	-5.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-8.73%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-2.74%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	3.97%	+2.94%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) at 6.97%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.93%	6.97%	+3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.18%	14.93%	+8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.61%	24.75%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.89%	24.39%	+8.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.89%	24.39%	+8.50%

NUKZ vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than BESF's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.86%	6.39%	0.00%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.84%	0.91%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and BESF in my portfolio?

NUKZ and BESF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or BESF?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to BESF (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, NUKZ or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 61.61% vs 28.33% for NUKZ. On fees, BESF is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BESF has been the lower-risk option at 6.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUKZ or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 61.61% return vs 28.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKZ or BESF?

BESF is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKZ or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 0.84% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NUKZ and BESF?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NUKZ and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.