NUKX vs. COMB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

NUKX vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NUKX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -7.63%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

COMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 7.61%
• 6M: 10.31%
• YTD: 22.64%
• 1Y: 35.68%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	$2.15M	$1.37M	$1.67M
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	$132.47K	$169.16K	$262.73K

NUKX vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	-22.51%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKX and COMB is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	-0.12

Return for Risk

NUKX vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 76
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 82
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUKX vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKX	COMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.37	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.56	—

Drawdowns

NUKX vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, roughly equal to the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKX	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.95%	-33.50%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.73%	-7.49%	-21.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-12.02%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUKX	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.22%	17.71%	+31.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.22%	16.72%	+32.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.22%	15.17%	+34.05%

NUKX vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKX vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than COMB's 7.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.38%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	6.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKX and COMB in my portfolio?

NUKX and COMB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUKX or COMB?

On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKX or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKX or COMB?

COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 6.83% for NUKX.

What is the main difference between NUKX and COMB?

NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.25% for COMB.