NUKL.DE vs. FLCH
NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKL.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUKL.DE returned 41.91%/yr vs 6.43%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKL.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NUKL.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKL.DE achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -7.83% return.
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- 49.09%
- 3Y*
- 41.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -10.41%
- 1Y
- 0.95%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 11.67% | 51.50% | 38.03% | 24.46% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -7.83% | 16.82% | 25.79% | -21.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKL.DE and FLCH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
NUKL.DE
FLCH
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUKL.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.02 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.06 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 0.13 | +4.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUKL.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.05 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.01 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKL.DE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKL.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -55.61% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.12% | -15.80% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.52% | -24.49% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.83% | -33.41% | +20.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -25.78% | +17.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 7.29% | +4.14% |
Volatility
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.98%. This indicates that NUKL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKL.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.05% | 5.98% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 13.11% | +15.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.82% | 18.79% | +23.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 28.33% | +5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 27.09% | +7.15% |
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKL.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKL.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
NUKL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.61% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKL.DE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
NUKL.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NUKL.DE and 0.19% for FLCH.
Find the right allocation for NUKL.DE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer