NUGT vs. WANT
NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) and WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUGT returned 15.97%/yr vs -9.92%/yr for WANT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUGT charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for WANT.
Performance
NUGT vs. WANT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -39.10% return, which is significantly lower than WANT's -19.95% return.
NUGT
- 1D
- 9.53%
- 1M
- -21.00%
- 6M
- -57.23%
- YTD
- -39.10%
- 1Y
- 46.53%
- 3Y*
- 45.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- -14.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -33.85%
WANT
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -19.95%
- 1Y
- -9.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- -9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.01%
NUGT vs. WANT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -39.10% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | 26.71% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -19.95% | -6.94% | 60.52% | 114.43% | -83.03% | 84.81% | 45.26% | 90.07% | -24.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGT and WANT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018 | 0.16 |
The correlation between NUGT and WANT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NUGT vs. WANT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUGT
WANT
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
NUGT
WANT
-
Communication Services
NUGT
-
WANT
Consumer Cyclical
NUGT
-
WANT
Consumer Defensive
NUGT
-
WANT
-
Energy
NUGT
-
WANT
-
Financial Services
NUGT
-
WANT
-
Healthcare
NUGT
-
WANT
-
Industrials
NUGT
-
WANT
Real Estate
NUGT
-
WANT
-
Technology
NUGT
-
WANT
Utilities
NUGT
-
WANT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGT vs. WANT — Risk / Return Rank
NUGT
WANT
NUGT vs. WANT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGT | WANT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.23 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | -0.53 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGT vs. WANT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than WANT's maximum drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and WANT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGT | WANT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -85.89% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.40% | -41.27% | -26.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.40% | -63.53% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.72% | -85.89% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -61.42% | -38.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.57% | -43.33% | -48.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.68% | 17.64% | +14.04% |
Volatility
NUGT vs. WANT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 24.61% compared to Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) at 15.21%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WANT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGT | WANT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.61% | 15.21% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.75% | 41.82% | +38.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.76% | 55.28% | +40.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.43% | 71.09% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.54% | 71.29% | +16.25% |
NUGT vs. WANT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGT has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than WANT's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGT vs. WANT - Dividend Comparison
NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than WANT's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.64% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.55% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGT and WANT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (24.61%) compared to WANT (15.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs WANT's -85.89%.
On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 15.97% vs -9.92% for WANT. On fees, WANT is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, WANT has been the lower-risk option at 15.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 15.97% return vs -9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WANT is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.55% for WANT.
NUGT is categorized as Gold, while WANT is Leveraged Equities. NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.13% for NUGT and 0.98% for WANT.
NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUGT and WANT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer