NUGT vs. HIBL
NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUGT returned 15.97%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for HIBL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUGT charges 1.13%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.
Performance
NUGT vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -39.10% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 59.83% return.
NUGT
- 1D
- 9.53%
- 1M
- -21.00%
- 6M
- -57.23%
- YTD
- -39.10%
- 1Y
- 46.53%
- 3Y*
- 45.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- -14.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -33.85%
HIBL
- 1D
- 10.51%
- 1M
- -19.93%
- 6M
- 50.26%
- YTD
- 59.83%
- 1Y
- 119.45%
- 3Y*
- 38.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.86%
NUGT vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -39.10% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 21.94% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 59.83% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGT and HIBL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.23 |
The correlation between NUGT and HIBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NUGT vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUGT
HIBL
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
NUGT
HIBL
Communication Services
NUGT
-
HIBL
Consumer Cyclical
NUGT
-
HIBL
Consumer Defensive
NUGT
-
HIBL
Energy
NUGT
-
HIBL
Financial Services
NUGT
-
HIBL
Healthcare
NUGT
-
HIBL
Industrials
NUGT
-
HIBL
Real Estate
NUGT
-
HIBL
-
Technology
NUGT
-
HIBL
Utilities
NUGT
-
HIBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGT vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank
NUGT
HIBL
NUGT vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGT | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 3.83 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 11.56 | -10.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGT vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than HIBL's maximum drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and HIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGT | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -88.27% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.40% | -31.39% | -36.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.40% | -69.66% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.72% | -81.58% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -23.42% | -76.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.57% | -43.61% | -47.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.68% | 10.38% | +21.30% |
Volatility
NUGT vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) is 24.61%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 30.74%. This indicates that NUGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGT | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.61% | 30.74% | -6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.75% | 64.08% | +16.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.76% | 77.09% | +18.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.43% | 83.45% | -10.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.54% | 92.50% | -4.96% |
NUGT vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGT has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGT vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison
NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than HIBL's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.42% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.64% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGT and HIBL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (30.74%) compared to NUGT (24.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs HIBL's -88.27%.
On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 15.97% vs 13.07% for HIBL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 24.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.64% for NUGT.
NUGT is categorized as Gold, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.13% for NUGT and 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUGT and HIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer