PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUEM vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUEM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


NUEM

1D
-1.30%
1M
3.53%
YTD
19.14%
6M
21.09%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUEM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.14%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%25.46%

Correlation

The correlation between NUEM and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.18

The correlation between NUEM and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUEM vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUEM
DBO

Technology

31.5%

-

Financial Services

18.2%
116.0%

Industrials

11.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%

-

Basic Materials

8.5%

-

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Healthcare

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

NUEM
31.5%
DBO

-

Financial Services

NUEM
18.2%
DBO
116.0%

Industrials

NUEM
11.9%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUEM
11.3%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

NUEM
8.5%
DBO

-

Communication Services

NUEM
8.2%
DBO

-

Energy

NUEM
3.3%
DBO

-

Healthcare

NUEM
2.9%
DBO

-

Utilities

NUEM
1.9%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

NUEM
1.6%
DBO

-

Real Estate

NUEM
0.7%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUEM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUEM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUEMDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

4.44

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

9.02

+3.92

NUEM vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUEM and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUEMDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.34

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.50

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.02

+0.39

Drawdowns

NUEM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEMDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-90.18%

+50.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-18.19%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-28.20%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-37.68%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-51.38%

+50.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-62.25%

+47.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

8.92%

-5.64%

Volatility

NUEM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) is 6.76%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that NUEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEMDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

12.61%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

28.20%

-12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

34.46%

-15.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

32.29%

-12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

31.78%

-11.60%

NUEM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUEM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.00%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUEM and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to NUEM (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUEM dropped -39.48% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 5.39% for NUEM. On fees, NUEM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NUEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUEM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

NUEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUEM and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer