PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUE vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NUE vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nucor Corporation (NUE) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUE achieves a 63.85% return, which is significantly higher than GWW's 30.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NUE having a 20.99% annualized return and GWW not far ahead at 21.41%.


NUE

1D
2.09%
1M
14.39%
YTD
63.85%
6M
62.42%
1Y
121.78%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
20.99%

GWW

1D
0.15%
1M
2.47%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.19%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
24.71%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUE vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUE
Nucor Corporation
63.85%42.03%-31.95%33.75%17.39%118.45%-1.77%11.84%-16.36%9.60%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
30.92%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NUE and GWW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984

0.39

The correlation between NUE and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NUE:

$61.07B

GWW:

$62.37B

EPS

NUE:

$10.12

GWW:

$37.26

PE Ratio

NUE:

26.31

GWW:

35.32

PS Ratio

NUE:

1.80

GWW:

3.42

PB Ratio

NUE:

2.85

GWW:

15.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

NUE:

$34.16B

GWW:

$18.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NUE:

$4.77B

GWW:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

NUE:

$3.49B

GWW:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUE vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUE
NUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUE vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nucor Corporation (NUE) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUEGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.19

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.00

1.64

+5.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.08

3.20

+17.88

NUE vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUE Sharpe Ratio is 4.43, which is higher than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUE and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUE vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUE drawdown since its inception was -68.34%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUE and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.34%

-56.73%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-13.92%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-24.50%

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.79%

-24.50%

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.21%

-41.60%

-15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.13%

-11.01%

-10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

7.61%

-1.50%

Volatility

NUE vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

Nucor Corporation (NUE) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 4.85%. This indicates that NUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

4.85%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

17.85%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.15%

24.78%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.73%

24.68%

+13.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.98%

28.52%

+7.46%

Dividends

NUE vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

NUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than GWW's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.70%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
NUE
Nucor Corporation
0.83%1.35%1.86%1.19%1.52%1.50%3.03%2.85%2.97%2.38%2.52%3.70%

Financials

NUE vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nucor Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
9.50B
4.74B
(NUE) Total Revenue
(GWW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NUE vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nucor Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
15.8%
40.0%
Portfolio components
NUE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 9.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

NUE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 9.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

NUE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 9.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NUE and GWW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUE has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to GWW (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUE dropped -68.34% vs GWW's -56.73%.

NUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUE and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer