PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUE vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NUE vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nucor Corporation (NUE) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUE achieves a 40.62% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, NUE has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 18.95%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.18% annualized return.


NUE

1D
-4.67%
1M
-8.57%
YTD
40.62%
6M
39.08%
1Y
76.56%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
18.95%

CB

1D
0.54%
1M
10.47%
YTD
10.66%
6M
9.84%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
18.39%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUE vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUE
Nucor Corporation
40.62%42.03%-31.95%33.75%17.39%118.45%-1.77%11.84%-16.36%9.60%
CB
Chubb Limited
10.66%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NUE and CB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993

0.31

The correlation between NUE and CB shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NUE:

$52.41B

CB:

$135.46B

EPS

NUE:

$10.12

CB:

$28.45

PE Ratio

NUE:

22.58

CB:

12.07

PS Ratio

NUE:

1.54

CB:

2.84

PB Ratio

NUE:

2.44

CB:

1.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

NUE:

$34.16B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NUE:

$4.77B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

NUE:

$3.49B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUE vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUE
NUE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUE vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nucor Corporation (NUE) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUECBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

2.36

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

5.30

+6.82

NUE vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUE and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUE vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUE drawdown since its inception was -68.34%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUE and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUECBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.34%

-50.99%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-9.36%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-14.35%

-33.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.79%

-19.26%

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.21%

-42.59%

-14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.18%

0.00%

-14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-10.67%

-10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.34%

4.15%

+2.19%

Volatility

NUE vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Nucor Corporation (NUE) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 6.47%. This indicates that NUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUECBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

6.47%

+4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.09%

13.34%

+8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.26%

18.03%

+12.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.80%

20.28%

+17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.01%

23.65%

+12.36%

Dividends

NUE vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

NUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than CB's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.14%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
NUE
Nucor Corporation
0.97%1.35%1.86%1.19%1.52%1.50%3.03%2.85%2.97%2.38%2.52%3.70%

Financials

NUE vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nucor Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
9.50B
1.88B
(NUE) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NUE and CB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUE has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to CB (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUE dropped -68.34% vs CB's -50.99%.

NUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUE and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer