NUDV vs. SCHV
NUDV (Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - NUDV tracks the Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUDV returned 15.87%/yr vs 18.86%/yr for SCHV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NUDV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
NUDV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUDV achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return.
NUDV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
NUDV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF | 9.63% | 10.77% | 14.02% | 10.13% | -7.83% | 8.92% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDV and SCHV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between NUDV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
NUDV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUDV
SCHV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
NUDV
SCHV
Technology
NUDV
SCHV
Industrials
NUDV
SCHV
Healthcare
NUDV
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
NUDV
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
NUDV
SCHV
Real Estate
NUDV
SCHV
Utilities
NUDV
SCHV
Energy
NUDV
SCHV
Communication Services
NUDV
SCHV
Basic Materials
NUDV
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
NUDV
SCHV
NUDV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUDV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.48 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 4.19 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 16.96 | -6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUDV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.69 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
NUDV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -37.08% | +16.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -6.83% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -15.26% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | 0.00% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.83% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.69% | +0.16% |
Volatility
NUDV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is 2.71%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that NUDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 3.09% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 8.13% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 10.63% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.51% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 16.94% | -1.97% |
NUDV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NUDV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.36% | 6.18% | 2.48% | 2.96% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NUDV and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to NUDV (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 3-year performance, SCHV leads with 18.86% vs 15.87% for NUDV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 18.86% return vs 15.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NUDV.
NUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.76% for SCHV.
NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NUDV and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUDV and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer