NUDM vs. NUMV
NUDM (Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUDM returned 7.98%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for NUMV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUDM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
NUDM vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's 9.74% return.
NUDM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDM vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 7.90% | 29.60% | 5.47% | 17.70% | -15.16% | 10.62% | 10.06% | 24.58% | -14.82% | 8.40% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 9.74% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 0.91% | 29.81% | -11.91% | 9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDM and NUMV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between NUDM and NUMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
NUDM vs. NUMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUDM
NUMV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Financial Services
NUDM
NUMV
Industrials
NUDM
NUMV
Technology
NUDM
NUMV
Healthcare
NUDM
NUMV
Consumer Defensive
NUDM
NUMV
Consumer Cyclical
NUDM
NUMV
Basic Materials
NUDM
NUMV
Communication Services
NUDM
NUMV
Utilities
NUDM
NUMV
Real Estate
NUDM
NUMV
Energy
NUDM
NUMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDM vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
NUDM
NUMV
NUDM vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUDM | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.74 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 10.37 | -3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUDM | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.92 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.38 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.45 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
NUDM vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and NUMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDM | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -43.46% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.50% | -8.71% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.47% | -19.53% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -25.71% | -4.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -0.42% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -6.89% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.29% | +1.05% |
Volatility
NUDM vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) at 2.97%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDM | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 2.97% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 9.14% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 12.49% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 17.39% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 19.77% | -2.18% |
NUDM vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDM vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than NUMV's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 6.92% | 7.46% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 4.31% | 1.47% | 3.42% | 2.45% | 0.47% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDM and NUMV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NUMV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs NUMV's -43.46%.
On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs 6.55% for NUMV. On fees, NUDM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUDM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.
NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.
NUDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.31% for NUMV.
NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUDM and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer