PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. NULG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDM vs. NULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than NULG's 17.92% return.


NUDM

1D
0.47%
1M
3.15%
YTD
8.57%
6M
10.96%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

NULG

1D
0.68%
1M
10.00%
YTD
17.92%
6M
17.45%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDM vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
8.57%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%8.40%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
17.92%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%39.23%0.31%10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and NULG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.67

The correlation between NUDM and NULG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUDM vs. NULG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDM
NULG

Financial Services

25.9%
7.1%

Industrials

21.2%
9.4%

Technology

12.1%
56.5%

Healthcare

10.8%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
9.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.9%

Communication Services

4.5%
6.5%

Utilities

3.8%

-

Real Estate

2.3%
1.2%

Energy

0.7%

-

Financial Services

NUDM
25.9%
NULG
7.1%

Industrials

NUDM
21.2%
NULG
9.4%

Technology

NUDM
12.1%
NULG
56.5%

Healthcare

NUDM
10.8%
NULG
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

NUDM
7.4%
NULG
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NUDM
6.0%
NULG
9.8%

Basic Materials

NUDM
5.4%
NULG
1.9%

Communication Services

NUDM
4.5%
NULG
6.5%

Utilities

NUDM
3.8%
NULG

-

Real Estate

NUDM
2.3%
NULG
1.2%

Energy

NUDM
0.7%
NULG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDM vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDMNULGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.76

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

2.38

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.09

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.70

7.12

-0.42

NUDM vs. NULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the NULG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and NULG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDMNULGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.76

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.71

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.90

-0.42

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum NULG drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and NULG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMNULGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-36.17%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-14.50%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-22.28%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-36.17%

+6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-6.84%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

4.26%

-0.92%

Volatility

NUDM vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) at 4.68%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDMNULGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

4.68%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

13.55%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

17.02%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

21.52%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

21.40%

-3.81%

NUDM vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDM vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than NULG's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.87%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDM and NULG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDM has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to NULG (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs NULG's -36.17%.

On 5-year performance, NULG leads with 15.23% vs 8.31% for NUDM. On fees, NULG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NULG has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULG has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.87%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NUDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NULG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.25% for NULG.

NULG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDM and NULG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer