PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUDM vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUDM vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
-0.28%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%11.84%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
9.35%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.


NUDM

1D
3.56%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
3.27%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*

KEMX

1D
4.34%
1M
-11.07%
YTD
9.35%
6M
21.09%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUDM vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDM vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDMKEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.36

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

3.00

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.25

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.66

13.60

-6.94

NUDM vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and KEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDMKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.36

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.50

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and KEMX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NUDM vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than KEMX's 3.00% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
7.48%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
3.00%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and KEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-38.80%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-15.36%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-30.85%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.16%

-11.68%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-9.02%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.67%

-0.55%

Volatility

NUDM vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) is 8.28%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that NUDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUDMKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

12.58%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

16.96%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

21.39%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

17.55%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

20.61%

-3.05%