NUDM vs. FID
NUDM (Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - NUDM tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG International DM while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUDM returned 7.98%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUDM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
NUDM vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.
NUDM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDM vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 7.90% | 29.60% | 5.47% | 17.70% | -15.16% | 10.62% | 10.06% | 24.58% | -13.52% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDM and FID is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between NUDM and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
NUDM vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUDM
FID
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Financial Services
NUDM
FID
Industrials
NUDM
FID
Technology
NUDM
FID
Healthcare
NUDM
FID
Consumer Defensive
NUDM
FID
Consumer Cyclical
NUDM
FID
Basic Materials
NUDM
FID
Communication Services
NUDM
FID
Utilities
NUDM
FID
Real Estate
NUDM
FID
Energy
NUDM
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDM vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
NUDM
FID
NUDM vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUDM | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 2.30 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 3.26 | -1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.62 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 9.14 | -2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUDM | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.30 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.46 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
NUDM vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDM | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -39.79% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.50% | -8.93% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.47% | -10.97% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -29.13% | -0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -1.11% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -8.47% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.55% | +0.79% |
Volatility
NUDM vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDM | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 3.00% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 8.12% | +4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 10.16% | +5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 17.04% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 18.96% | -1.37% |
NUDM vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDM vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% |
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 6.92% | 7.46% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 4.31% | 1.47% | 3.42% | 2.45% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDM and FID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, NUDM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUDM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.02% for FID.
NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUDM and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer