PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NUDM having a 12.01% return and BKIE slightly higher at 12.14%.


NUDM

1D
0.35%
1M
1.07%
6M
6.46%
YTD
12.01%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.69%

BKIE

1D
0.38%
1M
1.67%
6M
6.74%
YTD
12.14%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.46M$7.01M$6.05M
$2.51M$2.03M$1.85M

NUDM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
12.01%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%38.92%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
12.14%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and BKIE is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.96

The correlation between NUDM and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUDM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDM
BKIE

Financial Services

27.7%
26.6%

Industrials

20.8%
17.9%

Technology

14.6%
11.7%

Healthcare

9.9%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
7.2%

Basic Materials

4.8%
6.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
4.1%

Utilities

4.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
5.0%

Financial Services

NUDM
27.7%
BKIE
26.6%

Industrials

NUDM
20.8%
BKIE
17.9%

Technology

NUDM
14.6%
BKIE
11.7%

Healthcare

NUDM
9.9%
BKIE
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

NUDM
6.0%
BKIE
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NUDM
5.0%
BKIE
7.2%

Basic Materials

NUDM
4.8%
BKIE
6.7%

Communication Services

NUDM
4.6%
BKIE
4.1%

Utilities

NUDM
4.2%
BKIE
3.5%

Real Estate

NUDM
1.6%
BKIE
1.8%

Energy

NUDM
0.6%
BKIE
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUDM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUDMBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.34

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

9.09

-1.35

NUDM vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-28.19%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-11.41%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-13.19%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-28.19%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-4.88%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.93%

+0.40%

Volatility

NUDM vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.12%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDMBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.12%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

12.98%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

15.24%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.22%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.32%

+1.26%

NUDM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than BKIE's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.14%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.66%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NUDM and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUDM has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to BKIE (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.84% vs 8.93% for NUDM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 8.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 3.14% for BKIE.

NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDM and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer