PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 8.46% return.


NUDM

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.14%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.70%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*

BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
7.90%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%36.90%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and BKIE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.96

The correlation between NUDM and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUDM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDM
BKIE

Financial Services

25.9%
25.8%

Industrials

21.2%
18.6%

Technology

12.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
7.3%

Basic Materials

5.4%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.2%

Utilities

3.8%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.0%

Energy

0.7%
5.9%

Financial Services

NUDM
25.9%
BKIE
25.8%

Industrials

NUDM
21.2%
BKIE
18.6%

Technology

NUDM
12.1%
BKIE
10.1%

Healthcare

NUDM
10.8%
BKIE
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

NUDM
7.4%
BKIE
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NUDM
6.0%
BKIE
7.3%

Basic Materials

NUDM
5.4%
BKIE
7.2%

Communication Services

NUDM
4.5%
BKIE
4.2%

Utilities

NUDM
3.8%
BKIE
3.7%

Real Estate

NUDM
2.3%
BKIE
2.0%

Energy

NUDM
0.7%
BKIE
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDMBKIEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.56

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.23

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.99

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.46

7.68

-1.22

NUDM vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDMBKIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.56

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.92

-0.44

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-28.19%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-11.41%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-13.19%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-28.19%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.33%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-4.98%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.95%

+0.39%

Volatility

NUDM vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.42%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDMBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

4.42%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

12.17%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

14.58%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

16.12%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

16.34%

+1.25%

NUDM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than BKIE's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.92%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NUDM and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.05% vs 7.98% for NUDM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.

NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDM and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer