PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUBD vs. NUDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUBD vs. NUDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUBD achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than NUDM's 7.90% return.


NUBD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*

NUDM

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.14%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.70%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUBD vs. NUDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.20%6.75%1.31%5.42%-12.90%-2.19%7.17%8.22%0.32%0.26%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
7.90%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NUBD and NUDM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.12

Over the past year, NUBD and NUDM have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUBD vs. NUDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUBD
NUBD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NUBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUBD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NUBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUBD vs. NUDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUBDNUDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.73

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

6.46

-1.08

NUBD vs. NUDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the NUDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUBD and NUDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUBDNUDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.37

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.48

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.48

-0.19

Drawdowns

NUBD vs. NUDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUBD drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, smaller than the maximum NUDM drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUBD and NUDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUBDNUDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-32.01%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-12.50%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.94%

-13.47%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-30.09%

+12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-1.71%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-6.86%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

3.34%

-2.41%

Volatility

NUBD vs. NUDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) is 1.23%, while Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that NUBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUBDNUDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

5.22%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

13.03%

-10.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

15.74%

-11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.99%

16.64%

-10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

17.59%

-12.47%

NUBD vs. NUDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUBD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUBD vs. NUDM - Dividend Comparison

NUBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than NUDM's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.99%3.90%3.51%2.99%2.83%2.05%2.21%2.66%3.08%0.58%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.92%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUBD and NUDM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NUBD (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUBD dropped -19.45% vs NUDM's -32.01%.

On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs -0.06% for NUBD. On fees, NUBD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NUBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUBD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.99% for NUBD.

NUBD is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while NUDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. NUBD tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index, while NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for NUBD and 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUBD and NUDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer