NUBD vs. GBF
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF).
NUBD and GBF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUBD is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Aggregate ESG Select Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2017. GBF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both NUBD and GBF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUBD or GBF.
Correlation
The correlation between NUBD and GBF is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NUBD vs. GBF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
NUBD:
1.04
GBF:
0.94
NUBD:
1.53
GBF:
1.38
NUBD:
1.18
GBF:
1.16
NUBD:
0.38
GBF:
0.35
NUBD:
2.37
GBF:
2.24
NUBD:
2.16%
GBF:
2.16%
NUBD:
5.00%
GBF:
5.17%
NUBD:
-19.45%
GBF:
-19.67%
NUBD:
-8.50%
GBF:
-8.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUBD achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than GBF's 2.04% return.
NUBD
1.86%
0.75%
1.06%
5.39%
-1.10%
N/A
GBF
2.04%
0.45%
1.07%
5.12%
-0.92%
1.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUBD vs. GBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUBD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GBF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUBD vs. GBF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NUBD
GBF
NUBD vs. GBF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
NUBD vs. GBF - Dividend Comparison
NUBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than GBF's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.68% | 3.51% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.67% | 3.08% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.88% | 3.94% | 3.03% | 2.13% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 2.64% | 2.59% | 2.31% | 2.09% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
NUBD vs. GBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUBD drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GBF drawdown of -19.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUBD and GBF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
NUBD vs. GBF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) is 1.45%, while iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that NUBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...