NUAG vs. NULG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and NULG (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while NULG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUAG returned 0.51%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for NULG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUAG charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NULG.

Performance

NUAG vs. NULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than NULG's 16.76% return.

NUAG

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 5.51%
• 3Y*: 4.97%
• 5Y*: 0.51%
• 10Y*: —

NULG

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 8.41%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 15.85%
• 1Y: 26.42%
• 3Y*: 24.67%
• 5Y*: 14.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUAG vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.67%	7.37%	2.02%	7.52%	-13.97%	-2.03%	7.48%	10.13%	-1.45%	3.98%
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF	16.76%	14.07%	23.75%	42.71%	-28.43%	28.06%	39.58%	39.23%	0.31%	24.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NUAG and NULG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016	0.18

Return for Risk

NUAG vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUAG

NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 45
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NULG

NULG Risk / Return Rank: 42
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUAG vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUAG	NULG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.56	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.15	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	1.83	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	6.22	+0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUAG vs. NULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NULG Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUAG and NULG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUAG	NULG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.56	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.68	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.90	-0.58

Drawdowns

NUAG vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, smaller than the maximum NULG drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and NULG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUAG	NULG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.79%	-36.17%	+16.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-14.50%	+11.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.61%	-22.28%	+16.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.19%	-36.17%	+16.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.99%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-6.84%	+1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	4.26%	-3.42%

Volatility

NUAG vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) is 1.15%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that NUAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUAG	NULG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	4.80%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	13.55%	-10.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	17.01%	-13.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.01%	21.51%	-15.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.48%	21.39%	-15.91%

NUAG vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NUAG vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison

NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than NULG's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.49%	4.43%	4.44%	3.95%	3.60%	2.27%	2.93%	3.54%	3.79%	3.38%	0.48%
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.10%	0.11%	0.16%	0.43%	0.40%	5.08%	2.68%	1.10%	3.73%	0.61%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUAG and NULG in my portfolio?

NUAG and NULG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUAG or NULG?

NULG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to NUAG (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs NULG's -36.17%.

Which ETF is better, NUAG or NULG?

On 5-year performance, NULG leads with 14.66% vs 0.51% for NUAG. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NUAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUAG or NULG?

Over the 5-year period, NULG has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 0.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUAG or NULG?

NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NULG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUAG or NULG?

NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

What is the main difference between NUAG and NULG?

NUAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while NULG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NUAG tracks ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.25% for NULG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.