NUAG vs. NCLO
NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and NCLO (Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while NCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLO A Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NUAG returned 5.51% vs 5.92% for NCLO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUAG charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NCLO.
Performance
NUAG vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than NCLO's 2.00% return.
NUAG
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- —
NCLO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUAG vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.67% | 7.37% | -1.75% |
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF | 2.00% | 6.28% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUAG and NCLO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUAG vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank
NUAG
NCLO
NUAG vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUAG | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.95 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 12.87 | -6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUAG | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.63 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.60 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
NUAG vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and NCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUAG | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.79% | -3.05% | -16.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -3.05% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.31% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -0.20% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.46% | +0.38% |
Volatility
NUAG vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) at 1.07%. This indicates that NUAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUAG | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.07% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 3.46% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 3.64% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 3.71% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 3.71% | +1.77% |
NUAG vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NCLO's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NUAG vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison
NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than NCLO's 5.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF | 5.78% | 6.09% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.43% | 4.44% | 3.95% | 3.60% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.54% | 3.79% | 3.38% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUAG and NCLO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUAG has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to NCLO (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs NCLO's -3.05%.
On 1-year performance, NCLO leads with 5.92% vs 5.51% for NUAG. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NCLO has performed better with a 5.92% return vs 5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NCLO.
NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 4.49% for NUAG.
NUAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while NCLO is CLO. NUAG tracks ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while NCLO tracks JP Morgan CLO A Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.26% for NCLO.
NCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUAG and NCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer