NCLO vs. CLOI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NCLO (Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF) and CLOI (VanEck CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. NCLO is passively managed, while CLOI is actively managed. Over the past year, NCLO returned 5.98% vs 5.56% for CLOI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NCLO charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CLOI.

Performance

NCLO vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NCLO having a 2.12% return and CLOI slightly lower at 2.06%.

NCLO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: 5.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 7.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLO vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	2.12%	6.28%	0.35%
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	2.06%	5.84%	0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLO and CLOI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.17

Return for Risk

NCLO vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLO

NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 55
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CLOI

CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLO vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCLO	CLOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	4.72	-3.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	7.43	-5.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	2.16	-0.69
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	8.95	-6.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	42.16	-28.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCLO vs. CLOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the CLOI Sharpe Ratio of 4.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLO and CLOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCLO	CLOI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	4.72	-3.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	2.77	-1.14

Drawdowns

NCLO vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.05%, smaller than the maximum CLOI drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLO and CLOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCLO	CLOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-3.25%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-0.62%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.20%	-0.19%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	0.13%	+0.33%

Volatility

NCLO vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.14%. This indicates that NCLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCLO	CLOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	0.14%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.45%	0.67%	+2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	1.19%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.72%	2.56%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.72%	2.56%	+1.16%

NCLO vs. CLOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLO has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOI's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCLO vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison

NCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than CLOI's 5.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	5.35%	5.61%	6.71%	5.61%	2.23%
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	5.77%	6.09%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCLO and CLOI in my portfolio?

NCLO and CLOI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCLO or CLOI?

NCLO has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to CLOI (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLO dropped -3.05% vs CLOI's -3.25%.

Which ETF is better, NCLO or CLOI?

On 1-year performance, NCLO leads with 5.98% vs 5.56% for CLOI. On fees, NCLO is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, CLOI has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NCLO or CLOI?

Over the 1-year period, NCLO has performed better with a 5.98% return vs 5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NCLO or CLOI?

NCLO is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CLOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NCLO or CLOI?

NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 5.35% for CLOI.

What is the main difference between NCLO and CLOI?

They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NCLO and 0.40% for CLOI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.