NUAG vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. NUAG is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, NUAG returned 4.81% vs 29.43% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. NUAG charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

NUAG vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.32% return.

NUAG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 2.50%
• 6M: 21.40%
• YTD: 26.32%
• 1Y: 29.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUAG vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.43%	7.37%	2.40%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	26.32%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NUAG and DCMT is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.20

The correlation between NUAG and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to -0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NUAG vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUAG

NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 46
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 52
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUAG vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUAG	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.58	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.18	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.27	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	1.85	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.36	6.54	-1.18

NUAG vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUAG and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUAG vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUAG	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.79%	-15.96%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-15.96%	+13.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-9.33%	+8.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-3.54%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	4.51%	-3.61%

Volatility

NUAG vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) is 1.05%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that NUAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUAG	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	5.79%	-4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	16.87%	-14.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	18.76%	-15.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.01%	16.01%	-10.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.47%	16.01%	-10.54%

NUAG vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUAG vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than DCMT's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.91%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.54%	4.43%	4.44%	3.95%	3.60%	2.27%	2.93%	3.54%	3.79%	3.38%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUAG and DCMT in my portfolio?

NUAG and DCMT have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUAG or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to NUAG (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, NUAG or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 29.43% vs 4.81% for NUAG. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NUAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUAG or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 29.43% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUAG or DCMT?

NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUAG or DCMT?

NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.91% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between NUAG and DCMT?

NUAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.