NTSX vs. SCZ
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. NTSX is actively managed, while SCZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.41%/yr vs 5.82%/yr for SCZ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
NTSX vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCZ's 9.44% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
NTSX vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 7.12% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -7.87% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.44% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and SCZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between NTSX and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
SCZ
NTSX vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSX | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.07 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 7.84 | +2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -61.86% | +30.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -11.43% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -15.06% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -36.87% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -1.90% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -13.04% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 3.02% | -0.89% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 5.10% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 12.56% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.04% | 14.92% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 16.81% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 17.43% | +0.87% |
NTSX vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSX vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than SCZ's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.19% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and SCZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SCZ (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.41% vs 5.82% for SCZ. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.41% return vs 5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.40% for SCZ.
NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer