NTSE vs. DGRW
NTSE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. NTSE is actively managed, while DGRW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSE returned 6.15%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for DGRW. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
NTSE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 9.87% return.
NTSE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 30.29%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 59.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
NTSE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 30.29% | 36.29% | 4.42% | 9.47% | -26.31% | -5.66% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 9.87% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSE and DGRW is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between NTSE and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSE vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSE
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
NTSE
DGRW
Financial Services
NTSE
DGRW
Communication Services
NTSE
DGRW
Technology
NTSE
DGRW
Basic Materials
NTSE
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
NTSE
DGRW
Industrials
NTSE
DGRW
Healthcare
NTSE
DGRW
Energy
NTSE
DGRW
Real Estate
NTSE
DGRW
-
Utilities
NTSE
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
NTSE
DGRW
NTSE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.41 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 2.64 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.27 | 11.58 | +4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 2.22 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.89 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.86 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
NTSE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -32.04% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -8.30% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | -16.21% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.84% | -17.27% | -25.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -0.12% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -3.01% | -16.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 1.89% | +1.77% |
Volatility
NTSE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.49%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.12% | 2.49% | +6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.25% | 7.67% | +10.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.79% | 9.89% | +10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 13.97% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 16.21% | +3.03% |
NTSE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 2.54% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.44% | 3.22% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to DGRW (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.33% vs 6.15% for NTSE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for NTSE.
NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.
NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DGRW is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.28% for DGRW.
NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSE and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer