PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 9.87% return.


NTSE

1D
-1.31%
1M
7.69%
YTD
30.29%
6M
33.64%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

DGRW

1D
0.71%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
30.29%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.66%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.87%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and DGRW is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.57

The correlation between NTSE and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSE vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSE
DGRW

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
7.1%

Financial Services

2.1%
11.3%

Communication Services

1.8%
10.1%

Technology

0.8%
32.1%

Basic Materials

0.5%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
6.7%

Industrials

0.2%
9.9%

Healthcare

0.2%
12.8%

Energy

0.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Utilities

0.0%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSE
2.2%
DGRW
7.1%

Financial Services

NTSE
2.1%
DGRW
11.3%

Communication Services

NTSE
1.8%
DGRW
10.1%

Technology

NTSE
0.8%
DGRW
32.1%

Basic Materials

NTSE
0.5%
DGRW
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

NTSE
0.3%
DGRW
6.7%

Industrials

NTSE
0.2%
DGRW
9.9%

Healthcare

NTSE
0.2%
DGRW
12.8%

Energy

NTSE
0.1%
DGRW
5.0%

Real Estate

NTSE
0.1%
DGRW

-

Utilities

NTSE
0.0%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSEDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.41

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

2.64

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

11.58

+4.69

NTSE vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSEDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.22

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.89

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.86

-0.49

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-32.04%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-8.30%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-16.21%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.84%

-17.27%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-0.12%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-3.01%

-16.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.89%

+1.77%

Volatility

NTSE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.49%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

2.49%

+6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.25%

7.67%

+10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

9.89%

+10.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

13.97%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

16.21%

+3.03%

NTSE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.54%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to DGRW (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.33% vs 6.15% for NTSE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for NTSE.

NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DGRW is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.28% for DGRW.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer