NTSD vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. NTSD is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

NTSD vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NTSD

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 9.03%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 35.66%
• 3Y*: 29.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSD vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	17.91%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSD and QGRW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

NTSD vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 54
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSD vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTSD	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.08	1.66	+3.42

Drawdowns

NTSD vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSD	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-24.40%	+19.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-1.33%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-3.26%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NTSD	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.28%	17.40%	+6.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.28%	21.08%	+3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.28%	21.08%	+3.20%

NTSD vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSD vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.07%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSD and QGRW in my portfolio?

NTSD and QGRW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NTSD or QGRW?

On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSD or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NTSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSD or QGRW?

QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

What is the main difference between NTSD and QGRW?

NTSD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.28% for QGRW.