NTRL vs. KNG
NTRL (First Trust Equity Market Neutral ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTRL is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. NTRL is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTRL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
NTRL vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NTRL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- —
NTRL vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NTRL First Trust Equity Market Neutral ETF | -1.23% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRL and KNG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTRL vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
NTRL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNG
NTRL vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Equity Market Neutral ETF (NTRL) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTRL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTRL vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRL drawdown since its inception was -1.34%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRL and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTRL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -35.12% | +33.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.91% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -4.12% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
NTRL vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTRL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 10.42% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 13.59% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 17.15% | -5.35% |
NTRL vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTRL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTRL vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
NTRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.29% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
NTRL First Trust Equity Market Neutral ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTRL and KNG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NTRL.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.00% for NTRL.
NTRL is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NTRL and 0.75% for KNG.
Find the right allocation for NTRL and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer