NTRA vs. VST
NTRA (Natera, Inc.) and VST (Vistra Corp.) are both stocks. NTRA operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, NTRA returned 14.42%/yr vs 57.72%/yr for VST. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTRA vs. VST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTRA achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than VST's 0.94% return.
NTRA
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- 15.54%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 37.79%
- 3Y*
- 65.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 33.08%
VST
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- -12.49%
- 3Y*
- 88.21%
- 5Y*
- 57.72%
- 10Y*
- —
NTRA vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRA Natera, Inc. | 2.48% | 44.72% | 152.71% | 55.94% | -56.99% | -6.16% | 195.40% | 141.33% | 55.28% | -23.23% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.94% | 17.66% | 261.52% | 70.73% | 5.08% | 19.57% | -11.87% | 2.46% | 24.95% | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRA and VST is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.23 |
The correlation between NTRA and VST shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NTRA:
-$1.64
VST:
$8.60
NTRA:
12.95
VST:
2.41
NTRA:
$2.50B
VST:
$17.20B
NTRA:
$1.63B
VST:
$1.12B
NTRA:
-$294.86M
VST:
$4.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTRA vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank
NTRA
VST
NTRA vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTRA | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | -0.33 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | -0.59 | +3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTRA vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRA drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRA and VST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTRA | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.74% | -53.32% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.20% | -38.01% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -48.80% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.74% | -48.80% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.72% | -25.17% | +17.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.38% | -13.75% | -19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.52% | 21.12% | -7.60% |
Volatility
NTRA vs. VST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) is 12.58%, while Vistra Corp. (VST) has a volatility of 14.36%. This indicates that NTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTRA | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 14.36% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.53% | 36.88% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.14% | 48.93% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.02% | 48.04% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.82% | 42.22% | +18.60% |
Dividends
NTRA vs. VST - Dividend Comparison
NTRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRA Natera, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% |
Financials
NTRA vs. VST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natera, Inc. and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTRA vs. VST - Profitability Comparison
NTRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.44M and revenue of 696.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported an operating income of -93.52M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.4%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
NTRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a net income of -85.09M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in a net margin of -12.2%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTRA and VST have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VST has higher volatility (14.36%) compared to NTRA (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRA dropped -77.74% vs VST's -53.32%.
NTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTRA and VST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer