NTRA vs. ANF
NTRA (Natera, Inc.) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. NTRA operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NTRA returned 33.13%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for ANF. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTRA vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTRA achieves a -7.53% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -39.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NTRA has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 33.13%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 16.76% annualized return.
NTRA
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 63.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 33.13%
ANF
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -39.29%
- 6M
- -23.28%
- 1Y
- -0.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
NTRA vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRA Natera, Inc. | -7.53% | 44.72% | 152.71% | 55.94% | -56.99% | -6.16% | 195.40% | 141.33% | 55.28% | -23.23% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -39.29% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRA and ANF is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2015 | 0.17 |
The correlation between NTRA and ANF shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NTRA:
$29.98B
ANF:
$3.49B
NTRA:
-$1.64
ANF:
$10.45
NTRA:
11.69
ANF:
0.68
NTRA:
16.90
ANF:
2.60
NTRA:
$2.50B
ANF:
$5.28B
NTRA:
$1.63B
ANF:
$2.56B
NTRA:
-$294.86M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTRA vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
NTRA
ANF
NTRA vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTRA | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | -0.01 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | -0.02 | +2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTRA | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | -0.01 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.23 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.28 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.14 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
NTRA vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRA drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRA and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTRA | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.74% | -86.59% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.20% | -45.65% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -65.89% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.74% | -69.93% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.74% | -72.45% | -5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.73% | -60.27% | +43.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.49% | -42.90% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 23.70% | -10.51% |
Volatility
NTRA vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
Natera, Inc. (NTRA) has a higher volatility of 18.79% compared to Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) at 15.20%. This indicates that NTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTRA | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.79% | 15.20% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.34% | 38.18% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.35% | 61.45% | -19.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.01% | 60.97% | -3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.93% | 60.93% | 0.00% |
Dividends
NTRA vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTRA nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
NTRA Natera, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NTRA vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natera, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTRA vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
NTRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.44M and revenue of 696.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported an operating income of -93.52M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.4%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
NTRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a net income of -85.09M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in a net margin of -12.2%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTRA and ANF have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTRA has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to ANF (15.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRA dropped -77.74% vs ANF's -86.59%.
NTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTRA and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer