NTRA vs. ANF
Compare and contrast key facts about Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NTRA or ANF.
Correlation
The correlation between NTRA and ANF is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NTRA vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NTRA:
1.32
ANF:
-0.58
NTRA:
2.11
ANF:
-0.56
NTRA:
1.26
ANF:
0.93
NTRA:
1.97
ANF:
-0.57
NTRA:
7.76
ANF:
-1.18
NTRA:
8.24%
ANF:
31.30%
NTRA:
48.37%
ANF:
64.19%
NTRA:
-77.74%
ANF:
-86.59%
NTRA:
-16.34%
ANF:
-62.06%
Fundamentals
NTRA:
$20.30B
ANF:
$3.57B
NTRA:
-$1.51
ANF:
$10.69
NTRA:
0.00
ANF:
-24.52
NTRA:
11.96
ANF:
0.72
NTRA:
16.75
ANF:
2.67
NTRA:
$1.33B
ANF:
$4.95B
NTRA:
$814.56M
ANF:
$3.17B
NTRA:
-$91.09M
ANF:
$934.53M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTRA achieves a -6.46% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -51.17% return.
NTRA
-6.46%
-1.85%
20.98%
69.66%
34.58%
N/A
ANF
-51.17%
-11.63%
-53.44%
-33.24%
45.95%
15.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NTRA vs. ANF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NTRA
ANF
NTRA vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NTRA vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTRA nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRA Natera, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
NTRA vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRA drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRA and ANF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NTRA vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) is 18.65%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 27.64%. This indicates that NTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NTRA vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natera, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities