NTRA vs. ANF
Compare and contrast key facts about Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NTRA or ANF.
Key characteristics
NTRA | ANF | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 107.01% | 54.09% |
1Y Return | 151.79% | 159.43% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 0.87% | 54.67% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 31.23% | 53.92% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.29 | 3.05 |
Daily Std Dev | 44.57% | 54.18% |
Max Drawdown | -77.74% | -86.59% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -29.32% |
Fundamentals
NTRA | ANF | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $15.65B | $7.26B |
EPS | -$2.44 | $8.93 |
PEG Ratio | 0.00 | -24.52 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.36B | $4.66B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $732.63M | $2.97B |
EBITDA (TTM) | -$279.34M | $842.20M |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRA and ANF is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NTRA vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NTRA achieves a 107.01% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's 54.09% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NTRA vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NTRA vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTRA nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natera, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% | 2.79% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
NTRA vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRA drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRA and ANF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NTRA vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) is 12.25%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 22.96%. This indicates that NTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NTRA vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natera, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities