NTRA vs. ANF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF).

Performance

NTRA vs. ANF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NTRA vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTRA Natera, Inc.	-11.30%	44.72%	152.71%	55.94%	-56.99%	-6.16%	195.40%	141.33%	55.28%	-23.23%
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co.	-25.11%	-15.79%	69.43%	285.07%	-34.22%	71.07%	19.48%	-9.74%	19.24%	54.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NTRA : $27.78B ANF : $4.41B
EPS NTRA : -$1.52 ANF : $10.46
PS Ratio NTRA : 12.05 ANF : 0.87
PB Ratio NTRA : 16.22 ANF : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) NTRA : $2.31B ANF : $5.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) NTRA : $1.50B ANF : $2.13B
EBITDA (TTM) NTRA : -$309.91M ANF : $596.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTRA achieves a -11.30% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -25.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NTRA has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 35.72%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.70% annualized return.

NTRA

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: -11.30%
• 6M: 25.74%
• 1Y: 44.48%
• 3Y*: 54.11%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: 35.72%

ANF

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -3.67%
• YTD: -25.11%
• 6M: 9.40%
• 1Y: 19.66%
• 3Y*: 50.32%
• 5Y*: 22.29%
• 10Y*: 13.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NTRA vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTRA

NTRA Risk / Return Rank: 72
NTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
NTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ANF

ANF Risk / Return Rank: 54
ANF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ANF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ANF Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ANF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ANF Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTRA vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTRA	ANF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	0.29	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	1.00	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.13	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	0.63	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.16	1.21	+2.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTRA vs. ANF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the ANF Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTRA and ANF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTRA	ANF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	0.29	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.37	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.23	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.15	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between NTRA and ANF is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NTRA vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTRA nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTRA Natera, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.98%	4.63%	3.99%	4.59%	6.67%	2.96%

Drawdowns

NTRA vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTRA drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRA and ANF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTRA	ANF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.74%	-86.59%	+8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.20%	-36.96%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.74%	-69.93%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.74%	-72.45%	-5.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-50.99%	+30.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-42.82%	+9.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.51%	19.30%	-8.79%

Volatility

NTRA vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison

Natera, Inc. (NTRA) has a higher volatility of 15.05% compared to Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) at 13.87%. This indicates that NTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTRA	ANF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.05%	13.87%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.84%	48.80%	-20.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.45%	67.48%	-26.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.95%	61.07%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.09%	60.95%	+0.14%

Financials

NTRA vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natera, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NTRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a gross profit of 446.82M and revenue of 665.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.1%.

ANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NTRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natera, Inc. reported an operating income of -22.79M and revenue of 665.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.

ANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of 769.00K and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.

NTRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a net income of 47.26M and revenue of 665.50M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

ANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 172.13M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.