NTR vs. INGR
NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) and INGR (Ingredion Incorporated) are both stocks. NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while INGR operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, NTR returned 4.44%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for INGR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTR vs. INGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than INGR's -6.49% return.
NTR
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
INGR
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- -6.49%
- 6M
- -8.29%
- 1Y
- -25.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.79%
NTR vs. INGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 10.35% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | -6.49% | -17.86% | 29.22% | 14.08% | 4.47% | 26.35% | -12.55% | 4.70% | -33.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTR and INGR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between NTR and INGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NTR:
$4.93
INGR:
$13.96
NTR:
13.72
INGR:
7.28
NTR:
0.20
INGR:
0.08
NTR:
1.18
INGR:
0.92
NTR:
$27.76B
INGR:
$5.41B
NTR:
$8.66B
INGR:
$1.36B
NTR:
$6.33B
INGR:
$902.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTR vs. INGR — Risk / Return Rank
NTR
INGR
NTR vs. INGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTR | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.75 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.95 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | -1.58 | +3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTR vs. INGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, smaller than the maximum INGR drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and INGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTR | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -64.20% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.97% | -26.58% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.82% | -33.21% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.80% | -33.21% | -24.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.34% | -31.78% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -18.32% | -7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 16.03% | -7.54% |
Volatility
NTR vs. INGR - Volatility Comparison
Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) at 5.82%. This indicates that NTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTR | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 5.82% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.79% | 11.73% | +14.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.82% | 16.64% | +15.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.21% | 21.32% | +12.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.99% | 24.87% | +9.12% |
Dividends
NTR vs. INGR - Dividend Comparison
NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, which matches INGR's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | 3.21% | 2.92% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.67% | 3.23% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 1.57% | 1.52% | 1.82% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.23% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NTR vs. INGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutrien Ltd. and Ingredion Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NTR and INGR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTR has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to INGR (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs INGR's -64.20%.
NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTR and INGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer