NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS
NTPC.NS (NTPC Limited) and PAYTM.NS (One97 Communications Limited) are both stocks. NTPC.NS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while PAYTM.NS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, NTPC.NS returned 31.66%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for PAYTM.NS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTPC.NS achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than PAYTM.NS's -18.51% return.
NTPC.NS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -8.09%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- 1Y
- 14.22%
- 3Y*
- 31.66%
- 5Y*
- 31.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.73%
PAYTM.NS
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -18.51%
- 6M
- -20.33%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTPC.NS NTPC Limited | 12.02% | 1.49% | 9.71% | 96.38% | 40.35% | -8.06% |
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited | -18.51% | 27.61% | 60.18% | 19.67% | -60.21% | -14.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTPC.NS and PAYTM.NS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS — Risk / Return Rank
NTPC.NS
PAYTM.NS
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NTPC Limited (NTPC.NS) and One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTPC.NS | PAYTM.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.42 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 1.04 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTPC.NS | PAYTM.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.36 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | -0.16 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTPC.NS drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, smaller than the maximum PAYTM.NS drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTPC.NS and PAYTM.NS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTPC.NS | PAYTM.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -82.37% | +27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -29.89% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.30% | -67.89% | +35.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.96% | -41.15% | +27.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.53% | -54.62% | +30.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 12.17% | -8.57% |
Volatility
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NTPC Limited (NTPC.NS) is 6.39%, while One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that NTPC.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAYTM.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTPC.NS | PAYTM.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 11.95% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 28.34% | -12.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 35.53% | -17.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 51.76% | -26.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 51.76% | -25.91% |
Dividends
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Dividend Comparison
NTPC.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while PAYTM.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTPC.NS NTPC Limited | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 4.21% | 4.94% | 3.17% | 4.61% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 2.03% | 1.71% |
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NTPC.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NTPC Limited and One97 Communications Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NTPC.NS and PAYTM.NS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NTPC.NS and PAYTM.NS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer