PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAYTM.NS (One97 Communications Limited) and PRESTIGE.NS (Prestige Estates Projects Limited) are both stocks. PAYTM.NS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while PRESTIGE.NS operates in Real Estate - Diversified (Real Estate). Over the past 3 years, PAYTM.NS returned 14.00%/yr vs 38.33%/yr for PRESTIGE.NS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and Prestige Estates Projects Limited (PRESTIGE.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYTM.NS achieves a -18.51% return, which is significantly lower than PRESTIGE.NS's -14.92% return.

PAYTM.NS

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -20.33%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 14.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRESTIGE.NS

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -5.26%
• YTD: -14.92%
• 6M: -18.23%
• 1Y: -14.11%
• 3Y*: 38.33%
• 5Y*: 36.53%
• 10Y*: 22.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	-18.51%	27.61%	60.18%	19.67%	-60.21%	-14.50%
PRESTIGE.NS Prestige Estates Projects Limited	-14.92%	-5.75%	43.83%	154.94%	-2.04%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYTM.NS and PRESTIGE.NS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021	0.20

Over the past year, PAYTM.NS and PRESTIGE.NS have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYTM.NS

PAYTM.NS Risk / Return Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PAYTM.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PAYTM.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PAYTM.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRESTIGE.NS

PRESTIGE.NS Risk / Return Rank: 23
PRESTIGE.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PRESTIGE.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PRESTIGE.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PRESTIGE.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
PRESTIGE.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) and Prestige Estates Projects Limited (PRESTIGE.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAYTM.NS	PRESTIGE.NS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	-0.46	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	-0.48	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.94	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	-0.38	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	-0.86	+1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the PRESTIGE.NS Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYTM.NS and PRESTIGE.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAYTM.NS	PRESTIGE.NS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	-0.46	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.31	-0.47

Drawdowns

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYTM.NS drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than PRESTIGE.NS's maximum drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYTM.NS and PRESTIGE.NS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYTM.NS	PRESTIGE.NS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.37%	-72.03%	-10.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.89%	-37.56%	+7.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.89%	-48.40%	-19.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.15%	-33.89%	-7.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.62%	-25.18%	-29.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.17%	16.38%	-4.21%

Volatility

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Volatility Comparison

One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Prestige Estates Projects Limited (PRESTIGE.NS) at 9.42%. This indicates that PAYTM.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRESTIGE.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYTM.NS	PRESTIGE.NS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	9.42%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.34%	24.10%	+4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.53%	30.68%	+4.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.76%	40.62%	+11.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.76%	44.68%	+7.08%

Dividends

PAYTM.NS vs. PRESTIGE.NS - Dividend Comparison

PAYTM.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRESTIGE.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRESTIGE.NS Prestige Estates Projects Limited	0.13%	0.11%	0.11%	0.13%	0.32%	0.32%	0.56%	0.44%	0.55%	0.38%	0.71%	0.78%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAYTM.NS and PRESTIGE.NS in my portfolio?

PAYTM.NS and PRESTIGE.NS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.